![]() Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Safety Information / Your California Privacy Rights are applicable to you. ^ Back to Top ^ © 2023 ESPN Internet Ventures. Here is my breakdown and comparison of both players from a GM's perspective. Both will start the season playing left field for their respective teams, and both will come with expectations that only players of this caliber could normally handle.Īs a former general manager, I've seen my share of superstars, and both Trout and Harper fit the bill. Trout is a leadoff hitter, while Harper is a middle-of-the-order power hitter. The difficult part in comparing these two is they are completely different types of players. ![]() We also used the 20-80 scouting scale baseball uses to grade players' abilities in each of those tools. In this exercise we used the standard five "tools" with which baseball players are evaluated and included a sixth - intangibles - to compare their abilities. So who gives his team the best chance to win over the long term? Who's better: Mike Trout or Bryce Harper? Like it or not, the symmetry in age, early success and endless potential has intertwined their careers and inevitably begs for comparison. With good reason, the Los Angeles Angels' Mike Trout and the Washington Nationals' Bryce Harper are two of Major League Baseball's brightest young stars. ESPN Insider and former general manager Jim Bowden breaks down Mike Trout and Bryce Harper and determines who's better. Insider debuts this week "Who's Better?" a side-by-side breakdown of two of baseball's young superstars. MLB, Washington Nationals, Los Angeles Angels It's crazy.You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser Both Bryce Harper and Mike Trout, from a purely team standpoint, have had disappointing careers, but for one, Harper, his regular seasons stats have not been as impressive as Trout’s while having the same level of postseason success, none. If you're curious, Harper's on the exact opposite end of the spectrum - he's third from the BOTTOM in terms of fastballs seen (the guys below him: Josh Hamilton, Alfonso Soriano). And that's really awesome for a plus center fielder, so yeah, still taking Trout here. If I had to guess, I'd say that his actual line going forward will be a lot closer to his career ML mark right now. Somewhere awesome, but still, somewhere between. These are both small samples and his true talent is almost certainly somewhere in between. ![]() You can't just extrapolate a half season of out of this world production while throwing away a quarter season of futility last year. At Monday's All-Star Game media session, the best players in the. There's a chance he gets there this season, but I wouldn't bet on it. Mon, CINCINNATI Here, in one simple thought experiment, the difference between Mike Trout and Bryce Harper. I think the typical expectation going forward with Trout is that he'll bulk up, slow down a little, and gain some power as he ages (he's a pretty thick dude, after all), but in the short term we're talking about a guy's never hit HALF of 25 homers in any professional season. So yeah, projecting Trout for 25+ homers a year at this point is drinking the Kool-Aid pretty aggressively. If Trout keeps ripping homers all day long, he's probably going to start seeing a lot more breaking balls, and I think it's pretty likely that we'll see his power production (and probably his overall offensive production) take a step back toward reality. Trout kicks his ass in their age 20 and 21 seasons, though. a crappy cup of coffee) and is currently on pace to have a better age 22 season than Trout (3.7 WAR so far vs. Most (not all, but most) guys who see a ton of fastballs are slappy fast guys who can't hurt you (above him on this list: Jemile Weeks, Jamey Carroll). Harper had a better age 19 season than Trout (5 WAR vs. ![]() They have games to win, fans to entertain, endorsement offers to. So far only two hitters have seen more fastballs than Mike Trout this year. Mike Trout is 21, and Bryce Harper is 20, and the baseball future awaits with all the promise of a line drive headed for the gap. There's not really any precedent for what he's doing right now in terms of power in his track record. ![]() He hit 11 homers last year in an almost-full season at AA, and only 1 in 93 PA in AAA this season before coming up. I realize it's futile to say potentially negative things about Mike Trout to a guy with a Mike Trout icon, but there's a pretty good chance that this power you're seeing from Trout is a little bit of a mirage. Click to expand.Should we also point out that the 2012 sample size is only 258 ABs? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |